RETURN TO THE INDEX PAGE
reload this page
INFORMATION FOR ATTORNIES and JUDGES
If you're an attorney who has been in practice for any length
of time, I'm sure you've faced the following situations, far more
times than you care to think about:
You have a client who is guilty of a non-violent crime.
(S)he has finally reached a point in life where they're really
to turn things around; but, it seems as though this has occurred
too late for them... They've already used up all the chances
which anyone can expect to be given; so, it seems as though
the only option is to get them through prison in the shortest
time possible -- and HOPE that they remain as dedicated to
change while trying to cope with fitting in to the prison sub-
culture... Pretty disheartening -- to say the least!...
You have a client who is just getting started in their criminal
career; but, it's clear to you that, if you manage to get them
sentenced to probation and other common forms of alternative
sentencing, they will be right back in your office, charged with
another crime. (Great for the bank account; but, let's give you
the benefit of the doubt that you're a better human being than
that...) You aren't sure if prison would help their attitude;
OR, just make it even worse...
You have a client who has pulled something REALLY stupid
and prison is almost certainly going to be the outcome; BUT,
you know they don't really need to be there. They might even
have family obligations which will result in an undue hardship
to others while this person is incarcerated.
OR
If you're a prosecutor or judge; who's willing to consider
an efficient, cost-effective solution for dealing with these
types of defendants, at a financial and human cost which is
WAY below that of prison.
C.A.S. might be the solution you need...
C.A.S. stands for corporal alternative sentencing; but,
before you just sigh, shake your head, and leave, give me
a couple of moments to explain how this is a legal, viable
alternative to incarceration.
The first thing you're probably thinking is that this would
be a violation of the 8th Amend. The way this is set up, this
is NOT the case. A defendant's right to waive any right (or,
the current interpretation of that right) is well established
in legal precedent. The only exception to this is a single
review to a sentence of death. It occurs every day, with even
more fundamental rights, such as the right to remain silent
and not incriminate themselves, the right to a trial by jury,
etc. Through the use of voluntarily signed waivers, this form
of sentencing amounts to the court granting the defendants
request, rather than an imposition of a "cruel and unusual
punishment." The fundamental issues really vary little from
a situation in which that same defendant states that (s)he
wishes to plead guilty, rather than be tried by a jury.
Next, you're probably wondering just how safe this is.
Even with liability issues aside, no one wants to see
anyone injured; so, we have numerous safeguards in place.
to make sure that any serious injuries do not occur. In
order to be consider, the person must first pass an
exercise cardiology test (at his or her own expense) and
must be certified to be free of any medical condition which
would cause strenuous physical exertion to pose a threat
to their health. The methods and equipment we use are
intended to result in an extremely unpleasant experience;
but, to protect the spine and to result in only superficial
"damage" to the skin. Depending upon the person's skin
type the severity of the sentence , there can be some
resultant scarring; but, this is fairly uncommon and really
pretty insignificant, considering the alternative. From the
standpoint of liability, such minimal effects would be
covered under the liability release they would have to sign,
in order for us to accept their case.
The next consideration would be that of public safety
and the impact on the community. We do not consider
applications from people who are charged with violent
crimes; or, who have a history of violent behavior. It's
a well established fact that many non-violent criminals
will become violent in a prison environment, to prevent
their being victimized by the more predatory inmates.
These behaviors do not "just vanish" when they are
released back into the community. Through the use of
C.A.S., this is avoided -- not only is the person isolated
from any other inmates; but, they are treated civilly by
the staff who is working with them. Through the use of
victim impact statements, written assignments, and case
appropriate videos, a focus is placed upon this person's
own role in their situation. Also, if there is any history
of substance abuse, we will not agree to work the person's
case unless it is to be a condition of their probation that
they participate in an appropriate treatment and recovery
program. These elements combine to result in the person
emerging from the experience much better prepared to be a
productive member of the society than they would have been
if they had been dealt with using more conventional means.
A few other advantages which should be mentioned are:
1) This form of sentencing can be carried out in a limited
amount of time, allowing the offender to retain his or
her job. The expedites the payment of restitution to
the victim, reduces the burden upon the taxpayer both
in terms of a reduced cost of punishment and a reduced
likelihood of having to support the offender's family
while he or she is incarcerated.
2) There is only minimal impact upon the offender's family
situation. If the person is a single parent, it is far
more likely that (s)he will be able to find someone to
care for any dependent children, for the few days which
this form of sentencing requires, than it would be if
they were to be away for months, or even years.
3) The victim, if one exists, may be present while the
corporal portion of the sentence is being carried out --
permitting more of a sense of closure to the crime
than that which is possible if the offender were sent
to prison.
Hopefully, C.A.S. isn't sounding quite as far fetched now
as it might have originally seemed; but, I realize that you
may still have a lot of questions. I've tried to anticipate
as many of these as possible, both below and elsewhere on
this web site; but, this page is new and still very much
"under construction." Feel free to contact me with anything
which you would like to have clarified.
Q1) Where are these punishments carried out?
A1) While we would prefer to utilize space at your county
jail, we realize this is not always possible. In
lieu of that, we make do with whatever is available
to us, as long as it is secure and NOT the defendant's
home. (Hopefully, in the relatively near future, we
will have a self-contained trailer available.)
Q2) Won't this result in a "media circus?"
A2) No, the media doesn't even need to learn it has occurred.
There have already been a few cases which have been
resolved in this manner. All that needs to appear
on the record is that the offender was placed on
probation or given a deferred adjudication.
Confidentiality issues aside, we prefer that there
be no media exposure until we have a much a larger
staff base. You can be assured there will be no
"leaks" from our staff.
Q3) If there's no documentation, how do we know that this
portion of the sentence will be carried out?
A3) Simple -- it is carried out prior to the case being
adjudicated. You are welcome to be present; or, a
video tape can be provided to you. We will also
provided a signed affidavit attesting to the fact
that the sentence was completed.
Q4) How do we determine what would constitute a fair
sentence for the crime which was committed?
A4) After a review of the relevant facts of the case, we
can assist you with objective recommendations. From
there, it can be negotiated just as any other plea
agreement.
PARTYING???
If you're going to be driving to a party
read this before you go!
....................................................